+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 44.6% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:15.1%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:59.8%(+44.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:15.1%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:59.8%(+44.6%)
Providers:0