+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 2.0% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
6 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:67.8%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:69.8%(+2.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:67.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:69.8%(+2.0%)
Providers:0