+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 29.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (88.6%), ARC-C (83.7%), BoolQ (81.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:25.7%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:55.5%(+29.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:25.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:55.5%(+29.8%)
Providers:0