+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Pixtral-12B leads with 1.2% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 119.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
2 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:69.2%(+1.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:69.2%(+1.2%)
Providers:1