+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3 24B Base vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning leads with 17.6% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Base was developed as a 24-billion-parameter foundation model, designed to serve as a base for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide a strong starting point for domain-specific applications, it represents an intermediate-scale option in Mistral's model lineup.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Average Score:34.4%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%(+17.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
2023-10-01
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Avg Score:34.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%(+17.6%)
Providers:0