+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 20.6% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 236.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is $74.79 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
1 month newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($74.79 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:66.9%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:87.5%(+20.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 49 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 134 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:66.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:87.5%(+20.6%)
Providers:2