+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct leads with 23.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
2 days newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:67.5%(+23.8%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:43.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 49 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 134 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:67.5%(+23.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:43.7%
Providers:0