+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning leads with 6.7% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:45.3%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%(+6.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 49 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 134 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:45.3%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%(+6.7%)
Providers:0