+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 5.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:66.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:72.5%(+5.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 49 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 134 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:66.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:72.5%(+5.8%)
Providers:0