+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 9.1% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:58.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:67.3%(+9.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:58.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:67.3%(+9.1%)
Providers:0