+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 leads with 18.0% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.8%), IFEval (90.3%), AIME 2025 (72.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
NVIDIA
2025-08-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:46.0%
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Average Score:64.0%(+18.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
2024-09
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:46.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Avg Score:64.0%(+18.0%)
Providers:0