+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 42.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.4%), MMLU (80.6%), TriviaQA (80.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:16.9%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:59.8%(+42.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:16.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:59.8%(+42.8%)
Providers:0