+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct leads with 33.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.4%), MMLU (80.6%), TriviaQA (80.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.0% across 3 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.6%), AIME (57.5%), GPQA (52.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:52.4%(+33.8%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:18.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:52.4%(+33.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:18.6%
Providers:0