+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 13.7% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
1 month newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:56.4%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:70.0%(+13.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:56.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:70.0%(+13.7%)
Providers:0