+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct leads with 2.6% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:69.0%(+2.6%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:66.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
1 providers
Together
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:69.0%(+2.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:66.4%
Providers:1