+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads with 5.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
17 days newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:69.3%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:74.4%(+5.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:69.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:74.4%(+5.1%)
Providers:0