+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 23.6% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
5 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:56.4%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:80.0%(+23.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:56.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:80.0%(+23.6%)
Providers:1