+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 8.6% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
6 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:53.1%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:61.7%(+8.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:53.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:61.7%(+8.6%)
Providers:1