+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct leads with 6.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Multimodal was created to handle multiple input modalities including text, images, and potentially other formats. Built to extend Phi-4's efficiency into multimodal applications, it demonstrates that compact models can successfully integrate diverse information types.
4 months newer
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:81.0%(+6.1%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Average Score:74.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:81.0%(+6.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Avg Score:74.9%
Providers:1