+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads with 1.4% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
9 months newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:65.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:67.2%(+1.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:65.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:67.2%(+1.4%)
Providers:0