+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Nova Lite vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Lite leads with 7.9% higher average benchmark score. Nova Lite offers 46.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Nova Lite supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Nova Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Lite was developed as a lightweight multimodal model, designed to provide efficient AI capabilities for text and image understanding. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications with quick response times, it represents Amazon's entry-level offering in the Nova family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($0.12 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:85.2%(+7.9%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:77.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
1 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:85.2%(+7.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:77.3%
Providers:4