+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Nova Lite vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 17.2% higher average benchmark score. Nova Lite offers 171.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Nova Lite is $1.35 cheaper per million tokens. Nova Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Lite was developed as a lightweight multimodal model, designed to provide efficient AI capabilities for text and image understanding. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications with quick response times, it represents Amazon's entry-level offering in the Nova family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
9 months newer
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24($1.35 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:65.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:83.0%(+17.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
1 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:65.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:83.0%(+17.2%)
Providers:1