+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Nova Micro vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Micro leads with 11.7% higher average benchmark score. Nova Micro offers 224.0K more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Nova Micro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Nova Micro is a language model developed by Amazon. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.0% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (92.3%), ARC-C (90.2%), Translation Set1→en COMET22 (88.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Amazon's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
22 days newer
Nova Micro
Amazon
2024-11-20
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Input:$0.03
Output:$0.14($0.04 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Average Score:47.5%(+11.7%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:35.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
1 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Avg Score:47.5%(+11.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:35.8%
Providers:1