+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 42.2% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 106.5K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. o1-mini is $60.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.4%), MATH-500 (90.0%), MMLU (85.2%). It supports a 194K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00($60.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:61.8%(+42.2%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:19.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:61.8%(+42.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:19.6%
Providers:2