+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 15.6% higher average benchmark score. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 43 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:31.6%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:47.3%(+15.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:31.6%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:47.3%(+15.6%)
Providers:0