+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 20.1% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 268.0K more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Phi 4 is $74.79 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 days newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($74.79 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:54.4%(+20.1%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:34.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:54.4%(+20.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:34.3%
Providers:1