+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 19.1% higher average benchmark score. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:48.6%(+19.1%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:29.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:48.6%(+19.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:29.5%
Providers:0