+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 8.0% higher average benchmark score. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.0% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (94.8%), HumanEval (83.5%), MBPP (82.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:45.3%(+8.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:37.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:45.3%(+8.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:37.3%
Providers:0