Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 12.9% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $74.82 cheaper per million tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.9% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.7%), GSM8k (91.1%), MBPP (90.2%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)
o1
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
o1
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
o1
Azure
OpenAI
o1
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
o1
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Lambda