+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 27.4% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $74.60 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (93.8%), AIME 2024 (81.4%), LiveBench (74.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($74.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:52.3%(+27.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:24.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:52.3%(+27.4%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:24.9%
Providers:3