+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 36.4% higher average benchmark score. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (90.6%), IFEval (83.9%), AIME 2024 (79.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:59.1%(+36.4%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:22.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:59.1%(+36.4%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:22.7%
Providers:0