+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1-mini vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 24.7% higher average benchmark score. o1-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.4%), MATH-500 (90.0%), MMLU (85.2%). It supports a 194K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:27.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:51.7%(+24.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:27.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:51.7%(+24.7%)
Providers:0