+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1-mini vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 17.2% higher average benchmark score. o1-mini offers 62.5K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $13.35 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
12 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50($13.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:60.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:77.2%(+17.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:60.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:77.2%(+17.2%)
Providers:1