+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1-mini vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
QwQ-32B leads with 8.3% higher average benchmark score. o1-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, QwQ-32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.4%), MATH-500 (90.0%), MMLU (85.2%). It supports a 194K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (90.6%), IFEval (83.9%), AIME 2024 (79.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:39.2%
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:47.5%(+8.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:39.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:47.5%(+8.3%)
Providers:0