+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1-preview vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-preview leads with 22.0% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct offers 95.2K more tokens in context window than o1-preview. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $74.82 cheaper per million tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, o1-preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-preview was introduced as an early version of OpenAI's reasoning model series, designed to demonstrate the potential of AI models that engage in extended thinking before responding. Built to solve complex problems through deliberate reasoning processes, it represented an initial step toward more thoughtful and analytical AI systems.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
7 days newer
o1-preview
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($74.82 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Average Score:88.1%(+22.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:66.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Avg Score:88.1%(+22.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:66.1%
Providers:4