+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 5.6% higher average benchmark score. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
4 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:76.2%(+5.6%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:70.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:76.2%(+5.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:70.5%
Providers:0