+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 25.2% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 163.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $74.70 cheaper per million tokens. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
3 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($74.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:85.1%(+25.2%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:60.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:85.1%(+25.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:60.0%
Providers:1