+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 8.0% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Pixtral Large. Pixtral Large is $67.00 cheaper per million tokens. Pixtral Large supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
29 days newer
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00($67.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:74.7%(+8.0%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Average Score:66.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:74.7%(+8.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:66.7%
Providers:1