+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 10.2% higher average benchmark score. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:90.3%(+10.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:80.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:90.3%(+10.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:80.0%
Providers:0