+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 12.0% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 160.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is $74.25 cheaper per million tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 72B was developed as the flagship text model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced language capabilities with 72 billion parameters. Built to compete with frontier models in reasoning, coding, and general language tasks, it represents Qwen's most capable instruction-following model in this generation.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($74.25 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:85.3%(+12.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Average Score:73.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:85.3%(+12.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Avg Score:73.4%
Providers:4