+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 21.4% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
3 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:82.3%(+21.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:60.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:82.3%(+21.4%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:60.9%
Providers:0