+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 19.0% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
1 month newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:77.6%(+19.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:58.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:77.6%(+19.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:58.6%
Providers:0