+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. o1 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 30B A3B. Qwen3 30B A3B is $74.60 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B was created with a mixture-of-experts architecture featuring 30 billion total parameters and 3 billion active parameters. Built to provide strong capabilities with efficient inference through sparse activation, it balances performance with practical computational requirements.
4 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Qwen3 30B A3B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($74.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:73.1%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Average Score:73.5%(+0.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:73.1%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Avg Score:73.5%(+0.4%)
Providers:3