+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 7.0% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 168.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is $73.35 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Qwen3-Next 80B, designed to combine large-scale mixture-of-experts architecture with reliable instruction-following. Built to demonstrate efficient deployment of capable models, it balances advanced performance with practical computational efficiency.
8 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50($73.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:66.3%(+7.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Average Score:59.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:66.3%(+7.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Avg Score:59.3%
Providers:1