+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o1 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. o1 offers 168.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $73.35 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
8 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50($73.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:66.3%(+1.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:65.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 16 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 66 tok/s
Latency: 16.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:66.3%(+1.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:65.3%
Providers:1