+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3 vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 35.7% higher average benchmark score. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.5% across 22 benchmarks. It excels particularly in COLLIE (98.4%), AIME 2024 (91.6%), ARC-AGI (88.0%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (90.6%), IFEval (83.9%), AIME 2024 (79.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:55.0%(+35.7%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:19.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:55.0%(+35.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:19.3%
Providers:0