+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3-mini vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Pixtral Large. o3-mini is $2.50 cheaper per million tokens. Pixtral Large supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
2 months newer
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40($2.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1