+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3-mini vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 10.3% higher average benchmark score. o3-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
1 month newer
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:85.8%(+10.3%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:75.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:85.8%(+10.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:75.4%
Providers:0