+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3 vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 19.1% higher average benchmark score. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
14 days newer
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:87.1%(+19.1%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:87.1%(+19.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:0