+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3 vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 29.6% higher average benchmark score. o3 offers 163.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $9.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
7 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o3
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($9.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:84.9%(+29.6%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:55.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:84.9%(+29.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:55.3%
Providers:1