+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 33.8% higher average benchmark score. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
6 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:83.3%(+33.8%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:49.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:83.3%(+33.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:49.5%
Providers:0